Wenn diese Seite nicht korrekt angezeigt wird
gehen Sie bitte zur Originalseite



Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Joel Edgerton to Star in The Thing | /Film

the-thing_prequel

Universal Pictures’ prequel to John Carpenter’s cult classic thriller The Thing is gearing up to begin shooing in Toronto in mid-March, and the studio has begun to announce the cast line-up. Heat Vision has learned that Mary Elizabeth Winstead (Grindhouse, Scott Pilgrim) and Joel Edgerton (The Secret Life of Us, Kinky Boots) have been cast as the leads. We have a lot of information on both of their characters after the jump.

The screenplay, which was written by Ronald D. Moore, and rewritten by Eric Heisserer, tells the story of a shape-shifting alien terrorizes researchers at a Norwegian Antarctic facility. Here’s the logline:

In a remote Antarctica outpost, an alien spaceship is discovered far beneath the ice. When a group of ambitious scientists decide to thaw out one of the creatures inside, they’re in for the terrifying fight of their lives…

Mary Elizabeth Winstead

Winstead will play Kate Lloyd, who was described in the leaked casting breakdowns as follows:

pretty, bright-eyed, intelligent, she’s a graduate of Columbia and a Ph.D. candidate in paleontology (the study of prehistoric life). On the recommendation of her friend Adam Goodman, Kate is tapped for a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity by Dr. Sander Halvorson to join his research team in Antarctica, where an extraordinary discovery has been made. Upon arrival, Kate soon finds herself at odds with Halvorson about how best to proceed with the discovery — an alien spaceship with a mysterious and sinister frozen THING found nearby — specifically whether to transfer the specimen undisturbed to a more appropriate facility for analysis, or, per Halvorson’s wishes, to drill into the specimen’s ice encasement for a definitive tissue sample.

Joel Edgerton

Edgerton will play Sam Carter, a blue-collar mercenary helicopter pilot who Lloyd is forced to team with in an effort to stop the rampage. Here is his casting breakdown:

In his early 30s, rugged, handsome, blue-collar, he’s a helicopter pilot with a private charter service that transports personnel and supplies from McMurdo Station to remote research sites across Antarctica. Carter is a mercenary. He flies when he wants, where he wants, and he flies for one reason: money. But his resourcefulness, experience and get-it-done mentality make him indispensable.

And it seems as if there is a third lead character who has yet to be cast. Here is the breakdown:

[DR. SANDER HALVORSON] In his late 30s to early 50s, austere, scholarly and imperious, he’s a microbiologist from NYU who leads a science research team to Antarctica to help his old friend Edvard interpret and analyze an extraordinary discovery made beneath the ice. Sander, a brilliant scientist and a master of self-promotion, knows that his involvement in such an historic discovery will bring him fame and fortune. Blinded by ambition, he refuses to abandon the “project” even as the bodies pile up around him.

Matthijs Van Hejningen is set to direct. Watch 8 of Van Hejningen’s television commercials here.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

  • paul
    I'm getting really sick of the whole remake/prequel/sequel mentality going on in Hollywood right now. Stop mining all the classics for material! The Thing is great because it has a beginning, a middle and an end. (And I for one rather like the ambiguous ending...) They really need to stop trying so hard to convert classic movies into the next "franchise!"
  • zoey
    doing a prequel for this is such a brain dead lame idea.

    spoiler: the friendliest cutest puppy is the thing.
  • i love carpenter's the thing, but as with all of these remakes, reboots, these sequels and prequels, i will just keep an open mind.

    i mean, best case scenario, it will be a great flick on its own rights or be a gateway for others to find the original film. worst case scenario, i just pretend it doesn't exist and pop in my hd-dvd of the original film.
  • Scott
    that's the spirit!

    likelikelike
  • I saw the original for the first time a couple months ago and was absolutely floored. It was fantastic and probably the scariest film I've ever seen - not only because some of the effects were truly horrific, but because it's so psychologically terrifying. The blood testing scene almost made me lose control of my bladder because it was so suspenseful. It was definitely one of the greatest movies I've ever seen. However, I hear how kids at my school talk about films and I can't see them appreciating this prequel because they sure as hell won't appreciate the original. I can just hear them now: "Huh heh heh, the thing. Sounds fucking stupid." How sad. It's even sadder to think that in 20 years, every single film might be either a remake, sequel, prequel, or spin-off of one film made today.
  • PizpotGargravarr
    I think in 20 years the movie making landscape will be barely recognisable compared to what it is today. Who knows what will happen to the studios, the technology, the economy of filmmaking and especially the way we consume visual media in that time? Hollywood seems to be in a state of stagnation at the moment but that will surely soon change. These things happen in cycles after all.
  • Agreed. I know that the pendulum always swings the other way after a period of time, I was just being facetious and slightly bitter. I'm all for films being presented in new formats and seeing the new cinematic innovations that are coming forth, but new and original material would be nice as well. New and original material presented in new formats? That'd be fried gold.
  • Scott
    that's a ridiculous thing to say
  • Probably. It might be because I was joking. Hmmm.
  • MonsterKilledThePilot
    Hollywood should do exactly what John Carpenter did: remake the crappy b-movies from the 50's/60's. I've spent a lot of late-nights watching those movies and every single time I say the same thing: great concept but lame writing/acting.

    The optimist in me is hoping that this prequel will revive the sci-fi horror genre.
  • freemachine
    I hope they throw in a scene were one of the Norwegians aboard the helicopter notes that it would be a good idea to bring a couple of grenades...
  • RPK
    I have to agree with the general cynical responses to this prequel idea.

    Lately Hollywood has had a terrible record when rebooting horror classics.
  • Joel Edgerton's involvement just increased my interest. If he's to survive at the end, then I'm guessing he's the helicopter pilot that dies at the beginning of Carpenter's version. If not, however, this story might turn out to be way more interesting than I've been giving it credit for so far. If the leads escape, or if one of them do, and they AREN'T related to the Norwegians that chase the dog, then a third "The Thing" movie could actually take place on the mainland and follow them. That would add an edge to the prequel that would, in fact, make it ALSO a sequel. Now that would be kind of cool.
  • inteliboy
    he's b-grade material imo.
  • Scott
    how many movies have you seen him in?
  • Goat
    I cannot see this being more than a horrid remake of a classic horror film. It has the makings of a cliche ridden attempt to cash in on a cult fan base. 1) Unnecessary Female Lead 2) Obvious and forced re-creation of original films lead 3) Single-minded villain who will no doubt cause most of the problems after the first act. I predict a plodding, routine film, devoid of the paranoia and mood established by the 1982 classic.
  • [A]
    Why remake great movies..? Why remake great movies that are great remakes already..!?
  • Scott
    did you even read the article? it's not a remake
  • Ci
    Yeah, but...it is. Seriously. It's the same shit with a different cast. It's another AvP knock-off that will be forgotten.

    And this whole 'remakes will make people check out the original' argument is bullshit. Wake up, nobody checks out shit these days. Only real film enthusiasts will bother to check out originals of remakes or reimaginings or whatever the fuck you want to call it.

    Do you guys honestly think droves of moviegoers after watching Travolta mug for the camera in Taking of Pelham 123 suddenly went to Blockbuster to get a copy of the original? I don't think so.

    Also Scott, I 'liked' your comment by mistake, haha. Oh well!
  • wonka bar
    Screenwriters are going to have to start putting in (no sequel, no prequel) clauses in their contracts before selling their scripts to studios.
  • rainman
    Why would someone be dumb enough to cut themselves out of future residuals? Collect a check and don't associate yourself from the pile they made out of your original goodness. Win win. I mean, didn't James Cameron collect some dough of T3 and T4?
  • MickJ
    At this rate studios would never accept those in contracts. I'd never actually heard of anyone doing that before.
  • Dan P.
    Yeah, but the studios will get around that with "re-imaginings" ;)
  • Cyberdyne
    I showed the original (on blu-ray) to some friends of mine, and they were shocked when I told them it only used practical effects. Even if this remake is terrible, it will probably get more people to check out the original, which is a good thing.
  • damndirtyape
    Why did they have to put a woman in this? Part of what made Carpenter's version unique was the all-male cast. Now I'm waiting for the wisecracking funny gay sidekick character to be revealed.

    I'm an old grouch, so I'll stick with Carpenter's version.
  • Slatters
    By all means, go right ahead. Nobody is duck taping you to a theater seat.
  • PizpotGargravarr
    You can't make that promise.
  • Scott
    hahahaha, finally someone realised people who whine about movies that haven't been made yet DON'T HAVE TO GO.

  • damndirtyape
    Well isn't the whole point of the internet, aside from porn, for fanboys to dump on movies based on a few sparse news leaks?

    God knows that movie producers out there are trolling forums like this looking for insightful and constructive comments from autonomous posters. Are you saying I've been doing all wrong all these years by making snide pointless comments for fun?
  • I like Mary Elizabeth Winstead, she's a pretty decent actress.
  • Guest
    This will be the end: they fly away in the guys helicopter, she is relieved, but then realizes that he is (or might be) the thing.

    Sorry for the cynisism but I just really don't want this to happen, and if it does, it's really hard to think it'll be of the level of quality as The Thing with Kurt Russell is.
  • freemachine
    It will end with them chasing the dog, remember? I agree, this movie is a terrible idea.
  • Guest
    Oh right, haha, I can not believe I forgot about this.
  • Scott
    so they'll be Dutch?

    Way to go comic book guy.
  • nero
    Young Uncle Owen
blog comments powered by Disqus